Discussion about this post

User's avatar
George Q Tyrebyter's avatar

Today's progressives live in the Culture of Victimhood. In this culture, the most important thing to do is to raise up the marginalized. However, if you do that, they lose the status of being victims, and lose their position of honor. In the CoV, the victims cannot succeed. They must retain their victim status.

The most evil entities in the Culture of Victimhood are those persons who succeeded even though they are members of a marginalized group. Thomas Sowell is a successful conservative economist. He is hated by many because, as a black man, he should not have succeeded. Clarence Thomas also has this problem - he is too successful for the black male stereotype. He's an Uncle Clarence, or Uncle Tom.

With Jews, this issue is found in the State of Israel. Throughout history, Jews were demonized, attacked, pogromized, over and over. The Holocaust in the 1940s is only one of many systematic campaigns of destruction of the Jewish people. Along with the Roma, they were for many years amongst the most despised in Europe.

Starting in the 1920s, the Jewish colonization of their ancient homeland of Israel had a curious effect - the Jews went from "victim" to "victor". And they did it not because some Woke moron pulled up. No, they did it by their own efforts.

This explains a LOT of the intense hatred of the State of Israel. This is a Jewish state, but it refused to be a victim. This makes them the ultimate evil in the Culture of Victimhood - a group which became successful.

Expand full comment
Pete McCutchen's avatar

You accept the oppressor/oppressed dichotomy as the primary basis for any form of social and economic analysis, but you argue that Jews should be included in the oppressed category because of historical antisemitism.

The problem with this is that intersectionality and social justice are inherently collectivist ideologies. ALL analysis takes place among identity groups and ANY disparities in outcome among identity groups MUST be the result of oppression. Which is why Ibram

X Kendi claims that any policy, no matter how benign it might seem that has any disparate outcomes is verboten.

Jews, in terms of income, representation in Congress and elite professions and for that matter in the Forbes 400 are overrepresented. And Israel is far more successful not just than the territories controlled by the Palestinians but also surrounding Arab states.

Now I think this is due to some combination of high IQ and a highly intellectual culture, but in the social justice paradigm such explanations are verboten. Which is why Jews must be oppressors if you accept the ideology of social justice and intersectionality.

Since it’s a dumb and counterproductive ideology, the best idea is to just throw it out rather than trying to shoehorn Jews in.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts