The spiral of silence

A common destructive group psychology phenomenon

The spiral of silence theory, formulated by German political scientist Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, shows how individuals' perceptions of what are popular opinions impact their inclination to voice their opinions.

People regularly guess the prevailing opinions on issues. If they feel their opinion is in the minority, they are usually hesitant to express it. If they feel their opinion is in the majority, they are more likely to express it openly. The spiral is where perceived majority opinions become increasingly dominant and vocalized, while minority viewpoints are increasingly suppressed and marginalized over time. This creates a false public or community perception of what people believe.

The minority opinion is often mistaken for being the majority opinion. This often is because a small minority is unusually vocal, making their opinion seem more common than it is. It also is often due to media distortion and propaganda. The Abilene paradox is where a group comes to a collective decision that, because no one expressed their true desires, is contrary to the preferences of most or all individuals. In the Abilene paradox, most everyone secretly dislikes the agreed-upon decision.

The minority opinion is sometimes correct while the dominant opinion is false. Many cultural norms and ideas, such as sexism, racism and pseudoscientific ideas, are later identified as bad or false. Today’s common knowledge was often once a fringe and popularly-criticized notion.

.

The fear of social ostracization is the driving force

Humans are social animals and have evolved to gravitate towards groups for belonging and safety. The fear of social exclusion, or being ostricized, is primal and drives much human behavior and decision-making.

This fear explains why individuals conform to social norms, self-censor, and exhibit herd behavior. Cultures and leaders exploit this fear to maintain control, employing tactics such as censorship, propaganda, peer pressure, and the threat of shunning and public shaming. Many communities prioritize conformity and stability, discouraging dissent or disruption even when it is truth-telling. Public shunning and shaming serve not only to punish individuals but also to instill fear in onlookers.

.

The damage caused by spirals of silence

Spirals of silence are corrosive, creating unhealthy and dysfunctional communities. Members are frustrated and feel oppressed. A false sense of consensus on issues often misleads leaders and decisions are made that are unpopular and ineffective.

Minority voices are suppressed and marginalized. Novel and innovative ideas go unheard, hindering progress and innovation. Spirals of silence perpetuate groupthink and echo chambers. 

.

How to overcome spirals of silence 

Overcoming spirals of silence requires encouraging open and inclusive communication that welcomes diverse perspectives.

Groups and communities must create an atmosphere where individuals feel safe to express their opinions without fear of judgment or backlash. They must create platforms for people to express their views, and ensure that these platforms are accessible, inclusive, and promote open discussion.  

Community members must be educated about the spiral of silence theory, echo chambers, groupthink, and other corrosive group phenomena, and how and why they are harmful. There must be awareness about the importance of listening to and platforming diverse perspectives, and the dangers of silencing minority and heterodox voices.  

Organizations and communities need brave individuals willing to speak up, willing to say when the emperor has no clothes, and to speak truth to power. I speak up in part to permit others around me to speak up. My outspokenness also means I experience the standard types of punishment and peer pressure in response to those who speak up.