Why politics and religion shouldn't be taboo discussion topics
People have to learn how to be curious about others' beliefs
“Being taught to avoid talking about politics and religion has led to a lack of understanding of politics and religion. What we should have been taught was how to have a civil conversation about a difficult topic.” — Ryan Fournier
Avoiding discussions on politics and religion may seem to promote harmony, but it leads to misunderstandings, lack of empathy, and polarization. When we avoid these topics rather than learning to discuss them, we lose chances to develop skills like respectful listening, critical thinking, and finding common ground. Open, civil conversations on difficult issues help build connections and mutual understanding.
Labeling politics and religion as “taboo” can make people defensive when these topics arise. This silence stifles dialogue and risks reinforcing stereotypes, as people may turn to biased sources. Without open discussions, individuals may adopt rigid views that label their beliefs as “right” and others as “wrong.”
In highly partisan families, these rigid views can create an “us vs. them” mentality. Children raised in such environments often develop narrow perspectives reinforced by echo chambers, which can breed anxiety about other groups. Overcoming these patterns requires exposure to diverse perspectives.
Teaching world religions and political theories broadens understanding, encourages empathy, and builds critical thinking. People should be learning these things from a young age. Studying religions isn’t about endorsing faith but about recognizing the complexity of human beliefs, inspiring self-reflection and a well-rounded worldview.
I am a politically moderate agnostic Jew and have friends from many backgrounds—Christians to atheists, socialists to conservatives. Discussing comparative politics and religion with them, we’ve learned much from each other and helped to removed misunderstanding about others’ beliefs. When you respectfully and open-mindedly talk with people of other political or religious beliefs with your opponents, you learn how much you have in common.
.
I strongly agree about politics but not so much religion because there's an essential distinction between them, or should be. Politics in a secular democracy should be based on reason and argument, so yes, please debate politics. It's the foundation of our system as designed by our founders. That's why there's an Ammendment process for the Constitution. Religious texts like the Bible, Talmud, Koran, etc. vary in how adherants may interpret them, but belief is based on faith rather than reason. Of course families, fellow believers or close friends might debate, but I wouldn't dream of arguing about whether Jesus walked on water or the sanctity of cows in mixed religous company. I do agree wholeheartedly with your main premise though, and miss the days when my family used to debate ideas over holiday meals. Now it's all careful small talk and silly games, as if we're all afraid of going off script. Thanks for speaking up for conversation!
Wow you’re an idiot